The issue of consequences can be incredibly tricky. As parents, we grapple with questions such as what consequences make the most sense and what is too harsh or too lenient.
In our new film, Screenagers Under the Influence: Addressing Vaping, Drugs, and Alcohol in the Digital Age, adolescent psychologist and author Laura Kastner discusses the topic of consequences, emphasizing the importance of natural and logical consequences. Natural consequences directly respond to a person's actions or inactions, while logical consequences have some connection to the behavior being addressed.
Kastner says, “Natural would be if they lose their cleats three times, they're going to pay for it.”
In the context of cannabis use, Kastner notes in the film that parents have the right to take away drug paraphernalia as a natural consequence. She says, “If you just happen to find a pipe, the natural consequence then is to take the pipe.”
The concepts of logical and natural consequences overlap, and often they are actually one and the same. For example, when your consequence is to have your teen pay for something they keep losing, that is both logical and natural.
Learn more about showing our movies in your school or community!
Join Screenagers filmmaker Delaney Ruston MD for our latest Podcast
Learn more about our Screen-Free Sleep campaign at the website!
Our movie made for parents and educators of younger kids
Learn more about showing our movies in your school or community!
Register your interest in bringing our new movie to your school or community
Many parents default to taking away their child's device as the go-to consequence for any transgression, even if it is unrelated to phone rules. For example, a kid might have lied and said he went to the library after school, and the parent learns she actually went to a hang-out spot. A parent might exclaim, “That was completely not ok, and I am taking your phone away for the next week!”
Kastner says in the film, “Often parents know that since the phone is the most sacred, wonderful device in the teenager's life, it's sort of loose logic, just like, take that away, and that’s the best punishment. But it's not very logical.”
Not only is it not very logical when we resort to taking devices as the go-to consequence, but it can really backfire. It is normal that our kids might be mad at us for enforcing a consequence. But if our consequences feel arbitrary or excessively harsh, and always about devices, it can cause the child to focus on their anger towards us instead of reflecting on their misbehavior. This can take a serious toll on the relationship.
I often hear from young people about their frustration about devices being taken away when they didn’t break a rule around the device. What’s worse is that they tell me that the prospect of this punishment can deter them from disclosing thorny situations to their parents because they fear that they will get in trouble and lose their device privileges.
Learn more about showing our movies in your school or community!
Join Screenagers filmmaker Delaney Ruston MD for our latest Podcast
Learn more about our Screen-Free Sleep campaign at the website!
Our movie made for parents and educators of younger kids
Join Screenagers filmmaker Delaney Ruston MD for our latest Podcast
Register your interest in bringing our new movie to your school or community
Kastner says, “If they have misused the phone like there is a rule of not having it in the bed all night, they then used it, so take the phone.”
When rules about device use get transgressed, removing privileges around device use for a short time is logical.
I want to be clear that I am not saying youth should have 24/7 access to their phones or other tech. I am just talking about the risks of using it as the default disciplinary move.
As we’re about to celebrate 10 years of Screenagers, we want to hear what’s been most helpful and what you’d like to see next.
Please click here to share your thoughts with us in our community survey. It only takes 5–10 minutes, and everyone who completes it will be entered to win one of five $50 Amazon vouchers.
The issue of consequences can be incredibly tricky. As parents, we grapple with questions such as what consequences make the most sense and what is too harsh or too lenient.
In our new film, Screenagers Under the Influence: Addressing Vaping, Drugs, and Alcohol in the Digital Age, adolescent psychologist and author Laura Kastner discusses the topic of consequences, emphasizing the importance of natural and logical consequences. Natural consequences directly respond to a person's actions or inactions, while logical consequences have some connection to the behavior being addressed.
Kastner says, “Natural would be if they lose their cleats three times, they're going to pay for it.”
In the context of cannabis use, Kastner notes in the film that parents have the right to take away drug paraphernalia as a natural consequence. She says, “If you just happen to find a pipe, the natural consequence then is to take the pipe.”
The concepts of logical and natural consequences overlap, and often they are actually one and the same. For example, when your consequence is to have your teen pay for something they keep losing, that is both logical and natural.
Many parents default to taking away their child's device as the go-to consequence for any transgression, even if it is unrelated to phone rules. For example, a kid might have lied and said he went to the library after school, and the parent learns she actually went to a hang-out spot. A parent might exclaim, “That was completely not ok, and I am taking your phone away for the next week!”
Kastner says in the film, “Often parents know that since the phone is the most sacred, wonderful device in the teenager's life, it's sort of loose logic, just like, take that away, and that’s the best punishment. But it's not very logical.”
Not only is it not very logical when we resort to taking devices as the go-to consequence, but it can really backfire. It is normal that our kids might be mad at us for enforcing a consequence. But if our consequences feel arbitrary or excessively harsh, and always about devices, it can cause the child to focus on their anger towards us instead of reflecting on their misbehavior. This can take a serious toll on the relationship.
I often hear from young people about their frustration about devices being taken away when they didn’t break a rule around the device. What’s worse is that they tell me that the prospect of this punishment can deter them from disclosing thorny situations to their parents because they fear that they will get in trouble and lose their device privileges.
Kastner says, “If they have misused the phone like there is a rule of not having it in the bed all night, they then used it, so take the phone.”
When rules about device use get transgressed, removing privileges around device use for a short time is logical.
I want to be clear that I am not saying youth should have 24/7 access to their phones or other tech. I am just talking about the risks of using it as the default disciplinary move.
Sign up here to receive the weekly Tech Talk Tuesdays newsletter from Screenagers filmmaker Delaney Ruston MD.
We respect your privacy.
The issue of consequences can be incredibly tricky. As parents, we grapple with questions such as what consequences make the most sense and what is too harsh or too lenient.
In our new film, Screenagers Under the Influence: Addressing Vaping, Drugs, and Alcohol in the Digital Age, adolescent psychologist and author Laura Kastner discusses the topic of consequences, emphasizing the importance of natural and logical consequences. Natural consequences directly respond to a person's actions or inactions, while logical consequences have some connection to the behavior being addressed.
Kastner says, “Natural would be if they lose their cleats three times, they're going to pay for it.”
In the context of cannabis use, Kastner notes in the film that parents have the right to take away drug paraphernalia as a natural consequence. She says, “If you just happen to find a pipe, the natural consequence then is to take the pipe.”
The concepts of logical and natural consequences overlap, and often they are actually one and the same. For example, when your consequence is to have your teen pay for something they keep losing, that is both logical and natural.
An Oakland library has started lending out sports equipment and games alongside books, so families can borrow gear to use at nearby parks. It is a reminder that borrowing and lending between families is a simple way to fill a summer afternoon without a screen, while quietly modelling generosity and humility. We are out of practice at asking, but the person on the other end is usually glad to help.
READ MORE >
E-readers are convenient, but there are three reasons to lean toward paper books this summer. First, e-readers are screens, and the pull of everything else you could do on one makes it harder to stay immersed. Second, a large meta-analysis found people understand and remember slightly better on paper, especially with longer texts. Third, easy access to endless book samples makes it too tempting to jump ship rather than work through the slower parts, since reading, unlike TikTok, is about delayed gratification.
READ MORE >
Summer's wide open hours raise two perennial questions: how to reset screen time once the school-year structure disappears, and how to fill the freed-up days with things that are good for kids and parents alike. This week rounds up seven favorite past summer posts to help with both.
READ MORE >for more like this, DR. DELANEY RUSTON'S NEW BOOK, PARENTING IN THE SCREEN AGE, IS THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE FOR TODAY’S PARENTS. WITH INSIGHTS ON SCREEN TIME FROM RESEARCHERS, INPUT FROM KIDS & TEENS, THIS BOOK IS PACKED WITH SOLUTIONS FOR HOW TO START AND SUSTAIN PRODUCTIVE FAMILY TALKS ABOUT TECHNOLOGY AND IT’S IMPACT ON OUR MENTAL WELLBEING.
